@biomejs/biome vs Biomejs vs Eslint

Downloads & Popularity

Eslint leads with 117.6M weekly downloads — roughly 17.5x more. @biomejs/biome has 6.7M weekly downloads. Biomejs has 56 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Biomejs has the smallest gzipped bundle at 63.0 B. @biomejs/biome comes in at 195.7 KB. Eslint comes in at 334.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

@biomejs/biome has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Eslint has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Biomejs has an overall health score of 55/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose @biomejs/biome if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Biomejs if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Eslint if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is @biomejs/biome better than biomejs?

It depends on your needs. @biomejs/biome has a health score of 92/100 while Biomejs scores 55/100. @biomejs/biome has more weekly downloads (6.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.

Which has a smaller bundle size, @biomejs/biome or biomejs?

Biomejs has the smaller gzipped bundle at 63.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.

How many developers use @biomejs/biome vs biomejs?

Based on npm download statistics, @biomejs/biome has approximately 6.7M weekly downloads and Biomejs has approximately 56 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.

Which is better maintained, @biomejs/biome or biomejs?

@biomejs/biome currently has the higher overall health score at 92/100. @biomejs/biome has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Biomejs scores 60/100 on maintenance.