Skip to main content

Antd vs Material-ui

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Material-ui

709.3 KB gzipped

Most Popular

Antd

3.0M weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Antd

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Antd

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Antd

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

antd icon

antd

Very Popular

Version 6.3.5

0
85
Excellent

An enterprise-class UI design language and React components implementation

Weekly Downloads
3.0M
↓6%
Bundle (gzip)
14.0 MB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
material-ui icon

material-ui

Moderate

Version 0.20.2

0
53
Fair

React Components that Implement Google's Material Design.

Weekly Downloads
48.2K
↓10%
Bundle (gzip)
709.3 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
20
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Antd and Material-ui? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Antd leads with 3.0M weekly downloads — roughly 61.5x more. Material-ui has 48.2K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Material-ui has the smallest gzipped bundle at 709.3 KB. Antd comes in at 14.0 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Antd has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Material-ui has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Antd if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Material-ui if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Antd and Material-ui are solid choices for JavaScript development. Antd has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is antd better than material-ui?
It depends on your needs. Antd has a health score of 85/100 while Material-ui scores 53/100. Antd has more weekly downloads (3.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, antd or material-ui?
Material-ui has the smaller gzipped bundle at 709.3 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use antd vs material-ui?
Based on npm download statistics, Antd has approximately 3.0M weekly downloads and Material-ui has approximately 48.2K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, antd or material-ui?
Antd currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Antd has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Material-ui scores 20/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

@mui/material vs Antd@chakra-ui/react vs Antd

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.