Version 7.0.0
0
84
ExcellentNode.js test runner that lets you develop with confidence.
- Weekly Downloads
- 612.1K
↓5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 656.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
90
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
Ava vs Vitest
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Ava
656.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Vitest
42.7M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Vitest
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Ava
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Vitest
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 4.1.2
0
85
ExcellentNext generation testing framework powered by Vite
- Weekly Downloads
- 42.7M
↑13%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 553.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Ava and Vitest? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Vitest leads with 42.7M weekly downloads — roughly 69.7x more. Ava has 612.1K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Ava has the smallest gzipped bundle at 656.0 B. Vitest comes in at 553.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Vitest has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Ava has an overall health score of 84/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Ava if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Vitest if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Ava and Vitest are solid choices for JavaScript development. Vitest has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is ava better than vitest?
- It depends on your needs. Ava has a health score of 84/100 while Vitest scores 85/100. Vitest has more weekly downloads (42.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, ava or vitest?
- Ava has the smaller gzipped bundle at 656.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use ava vs vitest?
- Based on npm download statistics, Ava has approximately 612.1K weekly downloads and Vitest has approximately 42.7M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, ava or vitest?
- Vitest currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Ava has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Vitest scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.