Version 2.1117.0
0
85
ExcellentAWS CDK CLI, the command line tool for CDK apps
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.3M
↑14%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 6.9 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Aws-cdk vs Serverless
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Serverless
16.6 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Aws-cdk
3.3M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Aws-cdk
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Aws-cdk
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Serverless
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 4.33.3
0
85
Excellent[](https://serverless.com)
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.2M
↑10%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 16.6 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Aws-cdk and Serverless? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Aws-cdk leads with 3.3M weekly downloads — roughly 2.8x more. Serverless has 1.2M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Serverless has the smallest gzipped bundle at 16.6 KB. Aws-cdk comes in at 6.9 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Aws-cdk has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Serverless has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Aws-cdk if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Serverless if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Aws-cdk and Serverless are solid choices for JavaScript development. Aws-cdk has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is aws-cdk better than serverless?
- It depends on your needs. Aws-cdk has a health score of 85/100 while Serverless scores 85/100. Aws-cdk has more weekly downloads (3.3M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, aws-cdk or serverless?
- Serverless has the smaller gzipped bundle at 16.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use aws-cdk vs serverless?
- Based on npm download statistics, Aws-cdk has approximately 3.3M weekly downloads and Serverless has approximately 1.2M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, aws-cdk or serverless?
- Aws-cdk currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Aws-cdk has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Serverless scores 100/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.