Version 2.4.10
0
92
ExcellentBiome is a toolchain for the web: formatter, linter and more
- Weekly Downloads
- 6.7M
↑5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 195.7 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
@biomejs/biome vs Eslint-prettier
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Eslint-prettier
18.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
@biomejs/biome
6.7M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
@biomejs/biome
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
@biomejs/biome
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
@biomejs/biome
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
eslint-prettier
Niche
Version 0.0.0-empty
0
49
Fair- Weekly Downloads
- 1.7K
↓17%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 18.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between @biomejs/biome and Eslint-prettier? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
@biomejs/biome leads with 6.7M weekly downloads — roughly 3858.3x more. Eslint-prettier has 1.7K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Eslint-prettier has the smallest gzipped bundle at 18.0 B. @biomejs/biome comes in at 195.7 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@biomejs/biome has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Eslint-prettier has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @biomejs/biome if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Eslint-prettier if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @biomejs/biome and Eslint-prettier are solid choices for JavaScript development. @biomejs/biome has the edge in overall health score (92/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @biomejs/biome better than eslint-prettier?
- It depends on your needs. @biomejs/biome has a health score of 92/100 while Eslint-prettier scores 49/100. @biomejs/biome has more weekly downloads (6.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @biomejs/biome or eslint-prettier?
- Eslint-prettier has the smaller gzipped bundle at 18.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @biomejs/biome vs eslint-prettier?
- Based on npm download statistics, @biomejs/biome has approximately 6.7M weekly downloads and Eslint-prettier has approximately 1.7K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, @biomejs/biome or eslint-prettier?
- @biomejs/biome currently has the higher overall health score at 92/100. @biomejs/biome has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Eslint-prettier scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.