Version 2.4.10
0
92
ExcellentBiome is a toolchain for the web: formatter, linter and more
- Weekly Downloads
- 6.7M
↑6%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 195.7 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
@biomejs/biome vs Oxlint
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Oxlint
175.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
@biomejs/biome
6.7M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
@biomejs/biome
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
@biomejs/biome
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Oxlint
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 1.58.0
0
92
ExcellentLinter for the JavaScript Oxidation Compiler
- Weekly Downloads
- 4.1M
↑75%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 175.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between @biomejs/biome and Oxlint? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
@biomejs/biome leads with 6.7M weekly downloads — roughly 1.6x more. Oxlint has 4.1M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Oxlint has the smallest gzipped bundle at 175.0 B. @biomejs/biome comes in at 195.7 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@biomejs/biome has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Oxlint has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @biomejs/biome if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Oxlint if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @biomejs/biome and Oxlint are solid choices for JavaScript development. @biomejs/biome has the edge in overall health score (92/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @biomejs/biome better than oxlint?
- It depends on your needs. @biomejs/biome has a health score of 92/100 while Oxlint scores 92/100. @biomejs/biome has more weekly downloads (6.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @biomejs/biome or oxlint?
- Oxlint has the smaller gzipped bundle at 175.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @biomejs/biome vs oxlint?
- Based on npm download statistics, @biomejs/biome has approximately 6.7M weekly downloads and Oxlint has approximately 4.1M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, @biomejs/biome or oxlint?
- @biomejs/biome currently has the higher overall health score at 92/100. @biomejs/biome has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Oxlint scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.