Version 4.5.1
0
73
GoodSimple HTML5 charts using the canvas element.
- Weekly Downloads
- 9.0M
↑22%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 1.8 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
60
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Chart.js vs Nivo
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Nivo
82.1 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Chart.js
9.0M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Chart.js
60/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Chart.js
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Chart.js
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 0.31.0
0
49
Fair<img alt="nivo" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/plouc/nivo/master/nivo.png" width="216" height="68"/>
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.7K
↑6%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 82.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Chart.js and Nivo? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Chart.js leads with 9.0M weekly downloads — roughly 3405.5x more. Nivo has 2.7K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Nivo has the smallest gzipped bundle at 82.1 KB. Chart.js comes in at 1.8 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Chart.js has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Nivo has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Chart.js if you value large community support, strong security track record. Choose Nivo if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Chart.js and Nivo are solid choices for JavaScript development. Chart.js has the edge in overall health score (73/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is chart.js better than nivo?
- It depends on your needs. Chart.js has a health score of 73/100 while Nivo scores 49/100. Chart.js has more weekly downloads (9.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, chart.js or nivo?
- Nivo has the smaller gzipped bundle at 82.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use chart.js vs nivo?
- Based on npm download statistics, Chart.js has approximately 9.0M weekly downloads and Nivo has approximately 2.7K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, chart.js or nivo?
- Chart.js currently has the higher overall health score at 73/100. Chart.js has a maintenance score of 60/100 and Nivo scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.