Version 3.4.2
0
61
GoodElegant Console Wrapper
- Weekly Downloads
- 29.5M
↑21%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Consola vs Pino
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Pino
1.4 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Consola
29.5M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Pino
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Consola
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Pino
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 10.3.1
0
79
Goodsuper fast, all natural json logger
- Weekly Downloads
- 24.7M
↑26%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 1.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Consola and Pino? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Consola leads with 29.5M weekly downloads — roughly 1.2x more. Pino has 24.7M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Pino has the smallest gzipped bundle at 1.4 KB. Consola comes in at 2.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Pino has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Consola has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Consola if you value massive community and ecosystem, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Pino if you value massive community and ecosystem, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Consola and Pino are solid choices for JavaScript development. Pino has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is consola better than pino?
- It depends on your needs. Consola has a health score of 61/100 while Pino scores 79/100. Consola has more weekly downloads (29.5M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, consola or pino?
- Pino has the smaller gzipped bundle at 1.4 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use consola vs pino?
- Based on npm download statistics, Consola has approximately 29.5M weekly downloads and Pino has approximately 24.7M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, consola or pino?
- Pino currently has the higher overall health score at 79/100. Consola has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Pino scores 80/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.