Version 11.12.0
0
83
ExcellentClient for Contentful's Content Delivery API
- Weekly Downloads
- 875.4K
↓3%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 518.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
90
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Contentful vs Strapi
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Strapi
166.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Contentful
875.4K weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Contentful
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Contentful
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Contentful
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 3.6.11
0
71
GoodAn open source headless CMS solution to create and manage your own API. It provides a powerful dashboard and features to make your life easier. Databases supported: MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, SQLite
- Weekly Downloads
- 11.5K
↑38%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 166.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Contentful and Strapi? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Contentful leads with 875.4K weekly downloads — roughly 76.0x more. Strapi has 11.5K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Strapi has the smallest gzipped bundle at 166.0 B. Contentful comes in at 518.0 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Contentful has an overall health score of 83/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Strapi has an overall health score of 71/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Contentful if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Strapi if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Contentful and Strapi are solid choices for JavaScript development. Contentful has the edge in overall health score (83/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is contentful better than strapi?
- It depends on your needs. Contentful has a health score of 83/100 while Strapi scores 71/100. Contentful has more weekly downloads (875.4K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, contentful or strapi?
- Strapi has the smaller gzipped bundle at 166.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use contentful vs strapi?
- Based on npm download statistics, Contentful has approximately 875.4K weekly downloads and Strapi has approximately 11.5K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, contentful or strapi?
- Contentful currently has the higher overall health score at 83/100. Contentful has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Strapi scores 80/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.