Version 5.5.19
0
77
GooddaisyUI 5 - The Tailwind CSS Component Library
- Weekly Downloads
- 605.7K
↓5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 704.8 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
90
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Daisyui vs Shadcn-ui
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Shadcn-ui
2.3 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Daisyui
605.7K weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Daisyui
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Daisyui
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Daisyui
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 0.9.5
0
63
GoodAdd components to your apps.
- Weekly Downloads
- 127.6K
Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.3 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Daisyui and Shadcn-ui? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Daisyui leads with 605.7K weekly downloads — roughly 4.7x more. Shadcn-ui has 127.6K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Shadcn-ui has the smallest gzipped bundle at 2.3 KB. Daisyui comes in at 704.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Daisyui has an overall health score of 77/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Shadcn-ui has an overall health score of 63/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Daisyui if you value strong security track record. Choose Shadcn-ui if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Daisyui and Shadcn-ui are solid choices for JavaScript development. Daisyui has the edge in overall health score (77/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is daisyui better than shadcn-ui?
- It depends on your needs. Daisyui has a health score of 77/100 while Shadcn-ui scores 63/100. Daisyui has more weekly downloads (605.7K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, daisyui or shadcn-ui?
- Shadcn-ui has the smaller gzipped bundle at 2.3 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use daisyui vs shadcn-ui?
- Based on npm download statistics, Daisyui has approximately 605.7K weekly downloads and Shadcn-ui has approximately 127.6K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, daisyui or shadcn-ui?
- Daisyui currently has the higher overall health score at 77/100. Daisyui has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Shadcn-ui scores 40/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.