Skip to main content

Docusaurus vs Vitepress

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Docusaurus

173.5 KB gzipped

Most Popular

Vitepress

415.2K weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Vitepress

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Docusaurus

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Vitepress

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

docusaurus

Moderate

Version 1.14.7

0
71
Good

Easy to Maintain Open Source Documentation Websites

Weekly Downloads
22.0K
↑85%
Bundle (gzip)
173.5 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
80
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
vitepress icon

vitepress

Popular

Version 1.6.4

0
81
Excellent

Vite & Vue powered static site generator

Weekly Downloads
415.2K
↑10%
Bundle (gzip)
807.0 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Docusaurus and Vitepress? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Vitepress leads with 415.2K weekly downloads — roughly 18.9x more. Docusaurus has 22.0K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Docusaurus has the smallest gzipped bundle at 173.5 KB. Vitepress comes in at 807.0 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Vitepress has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Docusaurus has an overall health score of 71/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Docusaurus if you value strong security track record. Choose Vitepress if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Docusaurus and Vitepress are solid choices for JavaScript development. Vitepress has the edge in overall health score (81/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is docusaurus better than vitepress?
It depends on your needs. Docusaurus has a health score of 71/100 while Vitepress scores 81/100. Vitepress has more weekly downloads (415.2K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, docusaurus or vitepress?
Docusaurus has the smaller gzipped bundle at 173.5 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use docusaurus vs vitepress?
Based on npm download statistics, Docusaurus has approximately 22.0K weekly downloads and Vitepress has approximately 415.2K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, docusaurus or vitepress?
Vitepress currently has the higher overall health score at 81/100. Docusaurus has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Vitepress scores 100/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

Docusaurus vs Nextra

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.