Version 10.2.0
0
85
ExcellentAn AST-based pattern checker for JavaScript.
- Weekly Downloads
- 118.7M
↑5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 346.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Eslint vs Rome
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Rome
15.2 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Eslint
118.7M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Eslint
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Rome
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Eslint
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 12.1.3
0
60
GoodRome is a toolchain for the web: formatter, linter and more
- Weekly Downloads
- 18.6K
↑8%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 15.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
60
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Eslint and Rome? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Eslint leads with 118.7M weekly downloads — roughly 6375.7x more. Rome has 18.6K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Rome has the smallest gzipped bundle at 15.2 KB. Eslint comes in at 346.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Eslint has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Rome has an overall health score of 60/100 (good), with strong quality, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Eslint if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Rome if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Eslint and Rome are solid choices for JavaScript development. Eslint has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is eslint better than rome?
- It depends on your needs. Eslint has a health score of 85/100 while Rome scores 60/100. Eslint has more weekly downloads (118.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, eslint or rome?
- Rome has the smaller gzipped bundle at 15.2 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use eslint vs rome?
- Based on npm download statistics, Eslint has approximately 118.7M weekly downloads and Rome has approximately 18.6K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, eslint or rome?
- Eslint currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Eslint has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Rome scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.