Version 0.0.3
0
49
FairYet another node.js interface for philips hue
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.2K
↑54%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 318.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Hugo vs Next
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Hugo
318.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Next
42.7M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Next
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Hugo
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Next
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 16.2.2
0
85
ExcellentThe React Framework
- Weekly Downloads
- 42.7M
↑27%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 44.2 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Hugo and Next? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Next leads with 42.7M weekly downloads — roughly 19588.1x more. Hugo has 2.2K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Hugo has the smallest gzipped bundle at 318.0 B. Next comes in at 44.2 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Next has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Hugo has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Hugo if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Next if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Hugo and Next are solid choices for JavaScript development. Next has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is hugo better than next?
- It depends on your needs. Hugo has a health score of 49/100 while Next scores 85/100. Next has more weekly downloads (42.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, hugo or next?
- Hugo has the smaller gzipped bundle at 318.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use hugo vs next?
- Based on npm download statistics, Hugo has approximately 2.2K weekly downloads and Next has approximately 42.7M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, hugo or next?
- Next currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Hugo has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Next scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.