Version 9.0.3
0
85
ExcellentJSON Web Token implementation (symmetric and asymmetric)
- Weekly Downloads
- 35.5M
1%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 12.7 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Jsonwebtoken vs Paseto
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Jsonwebtoken leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
Version 3.1.4
0
53
FairPASETO for Node.js with no dependencies
- Weekly Downloads
- 28.0K
↑11%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 15.8 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Jsonwebtoken and Paseto? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Jsonwebtoken leads with 35.5M weekly downloads — roughly 1267.9x more. Paseto has 28.0K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Jsonwebtoken has the smallest gzipped bundle at 12.7 KB. Paseto comes in at 15.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Jsonwebtoken has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Paseto has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Jsonwebtoken if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Paseto if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Jsonwebtoken and Paseto are solid choices for JavaScript development. Jsonwebtoken has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is jsonwebtoken better than paseto?
- It depends on your needs. Jsonwebtoken has a health score of 85/100 while Paseto scores 53/100. Jsonwebtoken has more weekly downloads (35.5M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, jsonwebtoken or paseto?
- Jsonwebtoken has the smaller gzipped bundle at 12.7 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use jsonwebtoken vs paseto?
- Based on npm download statistics, Jsonwebtoken has approximately 35.5M weekly downloads and Paseto has approximately 28.0K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, jsonwebtoken or paseto?
- Jsonwebtoken currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Jsonwebtoken has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Paseto scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.