Version 1.14.3
0
85
ExcellentTiny and elegant HTTP client based on the Fetch API
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.2M
↓12%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 4.9 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Ky vs Node-fetch
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Ky
4.9 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Node-fetch
127.0M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Ky
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Ky
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Ky
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 3.3.2
0
61
GoodA light-weight module that brings Fetch API to node.js
- Weekly Downloads
- 127.0M
↑3%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 31.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Ky and Node-fetch? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Node-fetch leads with 127.0M weekly downloads — roughly 24.6x more. Ky has 5.2M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Ky has the smallest gzipped bundle at 4.9 KB. Node-fetch comes in at 31.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Ky has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Node-fetch has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Ky if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Node-fetch if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Ky and Node-fetch are solid choices for JavaScript development. Ky has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is ky better than node-fetch?
- It depends on your needs. Ky has a health score of 85/100 while Node-fetch scores 61/100. Node-fetch has more weekly downloads (127.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, ky or node-fetch?
- Ky has the smaller gzipped bundle at 4.9 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use ky vs node-fetch?
- Based on npm download statistics, Ky has approximately 5.2M weekly downloads and Node-fetch has approximately 127.0M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, ky or node-fetch?
- Ky currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Ky has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Node-fetch scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.