Version 0.0.0
0
45
FairNode.js implementation of RabbitMQ's shovel client.
- Weekly Downloads
- 147
↓44%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 62.6 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
20
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Ladle vs Styleguidist
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Styleguidist
335.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Ladle
147 weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Styleguidist
40/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Ladle
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Styleguidist
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 1.0.0
0
49
Fair🚫 Placeholder to prevent dependency confusion.
- Weekly Downloads
- 92
↑32%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 335.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Ladle and Styleguidist? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Ladle leads with 147 weekly downloads — roughly 1.6x more. Styleguidist has 92 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Styleguidist has the smallest gzipped bundle at 335.0 B. Ladle comes in at 62.6 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Styleguidist has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Ladle has an overall health score of 45/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Ladle if you value strong security track record. Choose Styleguidist if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Ladle and Styleguidist are solid choices for JavaScript development. Styleguidist has the edge in overall health score (49/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is ladle better than styleguidist?
- It depends on your needs. Ladle has a health score of 45/100 while Styleguidist scores 49/100. Ladle has more weekly downloads (147), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, ladle or styleguidist?
- Styleguidist has the smaller gzipped bundle at 335.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use ladle vs styleguidist?
- Based on npm download statistics, Ladle has approximately 147 weekly downloads and Styleguidist has approximately 92 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, ladle or styleguidist?
- Styleguidist currently has the higher overall health score at 49/100. Ladle has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Styleguidist scores 40/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.