Skip to main content

Next-auth vs Passport

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Passport

45.9 KB gzipped

Most Popular

Passport

5.9M weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Next-auth

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Next-auth

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Passport

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

next-auth icon

next-auth

Very Popular

Version 4.24.13

0
85
Excellent

Authentication for Next.js

Weekly Downloads
3.2M
24%
Bundle (gzip)
80.3 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
passport icon

passport

Very Popular

Version 0.7.0

0
61
Good

Simple, unobtrusive authentication for Node.js.

Weekly Downloads
5.9M
9%
Bundle (gzip)
45.9 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
20
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Next-auth and Passport? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Passport leads with 5.9M weekly downloads — roughly 1.8x more. Next-auth has 3.2M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Passport has the smallest gzipped bundle at 45.9 KB. Next-auth comes in at 80.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Next-auth has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Passport has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Next-auth if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Passport if you value large community support, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Next-auth and Passport are solid choices for JavaScript development. Next-auth has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is next-auth better than passport?
It depends on your needs. Next-auth has a health score of 85/100 while Passport scores 61/100. Passport has more weekly downloads (5.9M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, next-auth or passport?
Passport has the smaller gzipped bundle at 45.9 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use next-auth vs passport?
Based on npm download statistics, Next-auth has approximately 3.2M weekly downloads and Passport has approximately 5.9M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, next-auth or passport?
Next-auth currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Next-auth has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Passport scores 20/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.