Skip to main content

Oxc vs Swc

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Most Popular

Swc

15.7K weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Swc

40/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Oxc

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Swc

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

oxc icon

oxc

Niche

Version 1.0.1

0
49
Fair

Type `oxc` to Xcode with a workspace, project or file from the command line.

Weekly Downloads
1.6K
↑42%
Bundle (gzip)
0 B
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
20
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

swc

Moderate

Version 1.0.11

0
59
Fair

Alias for @swc/cli

Weekly Downloads
15.7K
1%Stable
Bundle (gzip)
129.0 B
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
40
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Oxc and Swc? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Swc leads with 15.7K weekly downloads — roughly 10.1x more. Oxc has 1.6K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Oxc has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Swc comes in at 129.0 B. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Swc has an overall health score of 59/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Oxc has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Oxc if you value strong security track record. Choose Swc if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Oxc and Swc are solid choices for JavaScript development. Swc has the edge in overall health score (59/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is oxc better than swc?
It depends on your needs. Oxc has a health score of 49/100 while Swc scores 59/100. Swc has more weekly downloads (15.7K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, oxc or swc?
Oxc has the smaller gzipped bundle at 0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use oxc vs swc?
Based on npm download statistics, Oxc has approximately 1.6K weekly downloads and Swc has approximately 15.7K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, oxc or swc?
Swc currently has the higher overall health score at 59/100. Oxc has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Swc scores 40/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

Esbuild vs Swc

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.