Version 5.3.3
0
81
ExcellentNode.js client to interact with the Pusher Channels REST API
- Weekly Downloads
- 492.2K
↑25%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 14.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Pusher vs Socket.io
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Pusher
14.2 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Socket.io
12.0M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Pusher
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Pusher
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Pusher
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 4.8.3
0
73
Goodnode.js realtime framework server
- Weekly Downloads
- 12.0M
↑21%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 415.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
60
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Pusher and Socket.io? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Socket.io leads with 12.0M weekly downloads — roughly 24.4x more. Pusher has 492.2K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Pusher has the smallest gzipped bundle at 14.2 KB. Socket.io comes in at 415.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Pusher has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Socket.io has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Pusher if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Socket.io if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Pusher and Socket.io are solid choices for JavaScript development. Pusher has the edge in overall health score (81/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is pusher better than socket.io?
- It depends on your needs. Pusher has a health score of 81/100 while Socket.io scores 73/100. Socket.io has more weekly downloads (12.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, pusher or socket.io?
- Pusher has the smaller gzipped bundle at 14.2 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use pusher vs socket.io?
- Based on npm download statistics, Pusher has approximately 492.2K weekly downloads and Socket.io has approximately 12.0M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, pusher or socket.io?
- Pusher currently has the higher overall health score at 81/100. Pusher has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Socket.io scores 60/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.