Version 2.3.2
0
43
FairA Component Library for Vue 3
- Weekly Downloads
- 41
↓74%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 30.6 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Melt-ui vs Park-ui vs Shadcn
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Shadcn
147.0 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Shadcn
3.0M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Shadcn
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Park-ui
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Shadcn
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 4.1.2
0
85
ExcellentAdd components to your apps.
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.0M
↑123%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 147.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Park-ui and Shadcn? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Shadcn leads with 3.0M weekly downloads — roughly 73643.4x more. Park-ui has 41 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Shadcn has the smallest gzipped bundle at 147.0 KB. Park-ui comes in at 30.6 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Shadcn has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Park-ui has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Park-ui if you value strong security track record. Choose Shadcn if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Park-ui and Shadcn are solid choices for JavaScript development. Shadcn has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is park-ui better than shadcn?
- It depends on your needs. Park-ui has a health score of 43/100 while Shadcn scores 85/100. Shadcn has more weekly downloads (3.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, park-ui or shadcn?
- Shadcn has the smaller gzipped bundle at 147.0 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use park-ui vs shadcn?
- Based on npm download statistics, Park-ui has approximately 41 weekly downloads and Shadcn has approximately 3.0M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, park-ui or shadcn?
- Shadcn currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Park-ui has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Shadcn scores 100/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.