Skip to main content

Radix vs Shadcn

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Radix

379.0 B gzipped

Most Popular

Shadcn

3.0M weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Shadcn

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Radix

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Shadcn

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

radix

Niche

Version 0.0.0

0
47
Fair

A module for converting numbers between different bases

Weekly Downloads
574
7%
Bundle (gzip)
379.0 B
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
20
Popularity
30
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
shadcn icon

shadcn

Very Popular

Version 4.1.2

0
85
Excellent

Add components to your apps.

Weekly Downloads
3.0M
123%
Bundle (gzip)
147.0 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Radix and Shadcn? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Shadcn leads with 3.0M weekly downloads — roughly 5260.2x more. Radix has 574 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Radix has the smallest gzipped bundle at 379.0 B. Shadcn comes in at 147.0 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Shadcn has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Radix has an overall health score of 47/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Radix if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Shadcn if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Radix and Shadcn are solid choices for JavaScript development. Shadcn has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is radix better than shadcn?
It depends on your needs. Radix has a health score of 47/100 while Shadcn scores 85/100. Shadcn has more weekly downloads (3.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, radix or shadcn?
Radix has the smaller gzipped bundle at 379.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use radix vs shadcn?
Based on npm download statistics, Radix has approximately 574 weekly downloads and Shadcn has approximately 3.0M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, radix or shadcn?
Shadcn currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Radix has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Shadcn scores 100/100 on maintenance.

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.