Version 1.0.0-beta.1
0
73
GoodA fast story book powered by Vite
- Weekly Downloads
- 80.8K
↑29%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 105.6 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
70
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Histoire vs Ladle vs Storybook-8
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Ladle
62.6 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Histoire
80.8K weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Histoire
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Histoire
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Histoire
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 0.0.0
0
45
FairNode.js implementation of RabbitMQ's shovel client.
- Weekly Downloads
- 168
↓31%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 62.6 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
20
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Histoire and Ladle? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Histoire leads with 80.8K weekly downloads — roughly 481.1x more. Ladle has 168 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Ladle has the smallest gzipped bundle at 62.6 KB. Histoire comes in at 105.6 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Histoire has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Ladle has an overall health score of 45/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Histoire if you value strong security track record. Choose Ladle if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Histoire and Ladle are solid choices for JavaScript development. Histoire has the edge in overall health score (73/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is histoire better than ladle?
- It depends on your needs. Histoire has a health score of 73/100 while Ladle scores 45/100. Histoire has more weekly downloads (80.8K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, histoire or ladle?
- Ladle has the smaller gzipped bundle at 62.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use histoire vs ladle?
- Based on npm download statistics, Histoire has approximately 80.8K weekly downloads and Ladle has approximately 168 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, histoire or ladle?
- Histoire currently has the higher overall health score at 73/100. Histoire has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Ladle scores 20/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.