swc
Moderate
Version 1.0.11
0
59
FairAlias for @swc/cli
- Weekly Downloads
- 15.6K
↓16%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 89.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Swc vs Typescript
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Swc
89.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Typescript
160.5M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Typescript
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Typescript
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Typescript
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 6.0.2
0
92
ExcellentTypeScript is a language for application scale JavaScript development
- Weekly Downloads
- 160.5M
↑7%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 7.0 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Swc and Typescript? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Typescript leads with 160.5M weekly downloads — roughly 10318.2x more. Swc has 15.6K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Swc has the smallest gzipped bundle at 89.0 B. Typescript comes in at 7.0 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Typescript has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Swc has an overall health score of 59/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Swc if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Typescript if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Swc and Typescript are solid choices for JavaScript development. Typescript has the edge in overall health score (92/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is swc better than typescript?
- It depends on your needs. Swc has a health score of 59/100 while Typescript scores 92/100. Typescript has more weekly downloads (160.5M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, swc or typescript?
- Swc has the smaller gzipped bundle at 89.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use swc vs typescript?
- Based on npm download statistics, Swc has approximately 15.6K weekly downloads and Typescript has approximately 160.5M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, swc or typescript?
- Typescript currently has the higher overall health score at 92/100. Swc has a maintenance score of 40/100 and Typescript scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.