turbopack
Niche
Version 0.0.1
0
47
Fair- Weekly Downloads
- 807
↓9%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 150.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
30
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Turbopack vs Vite
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Turbopack
150.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Vite
90.0M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Vite
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Turbopack
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Vite
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 8.0.3
0
85
ExcellentNative-ESM powered web dev build tool
- Weekly Downloads
- 90.0M
↑43%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 638.7 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Turbopack and Vite? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Vite leads with 90.0M weekly downloads — roughly 111569.5x more. Turbopack has 807 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Turbopack has the smallest gzipped bundle at 150.0 B. Vite comes in at 638.7 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Vite has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Turbopack has an overall health score of 47/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Turbopack if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Vite if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Turbopack and Vite are solid choices for JavaScript development. Vite has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is turbopack better than vite?
- It depends on your needs. Turbopack has a health score of 47/100 while Vite scores 85/100. Vite has more weekly downloads (90.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, turbopack or vite?
- Turbopack has the smaller gzipped bundle at 150.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use turbopack vs vite?
- Based on npm download statistics, Turbopack has approximately 807 weekly downloads and Vite has approximately 90.0M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, turbopack or vite?
- Vite currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Turbopack has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Vite scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.