Biome vs ESLint + Prettier: The Linter Wars 2026
Before Biome, linting and formatting a typical JavaScript project required 127 npm packages, 3 config files, and a lint-staged hook that took seconds to run. Biome replaces all of that with a single binary that runs in 50ms. The question isn't whether Biome is faster — it's 10-25x faster. The question is whether "10-25x faster" matters enough to migrate from the ESLint ecosystem you already know.
TL;DR
Biome is the right choice for new projects, or for projects where lint/format speed is noticeably impacting developer experience. ESLint + Prettier is still the right choice for projects that rely on framework-specific ESLint plugins (Next.js, React, TypeScript strict rules) that Biome doesn't yet fully replicate. Biome v2.x has closed the gap significantly — but not all the way.
Key Takeaways
- Biome: formats 1K files in 50ms vs. Prettier's 1-2s; lints 10K files in 0.8s vs. ESLint's 45s (~25x overall)
@biomejs/biome: ~5.4M weekly npm downloads, rapidly growingeslint: ~85M weekly downloads — still dominant by 15x- Biome ships as a single binary with zero npm dependencies (127 packages → 1)
- Biome v2.4 (March 2026) has 450+ lint rules and type-aware linting (own synthesizer, ~85% typescript-eslint coverage)
- Biome's formatter is 96-97% compatible with Prettier — verified against Prettier's own test suite
- ESLint's plugin ecosystem (react-hooks, testing-library, next.js) has key gaps in Biome
What Biome Is
Biome is a Rust-powered toolchain for JavaScript/TypeScript that replaces multiple tools at once:
- Formatter: Prettier replacement
- Linter: ESLint replacement
- Import organizer: perfectionist/eslint-plugin-import replacement
- (Planned): Bundler, test runner, type checker
It was forked from Rome (abandoned) and has been maintained by an active community since 2023. The current stable version is v2.x (2026).
Installation
# ESLint + Prettier (current setup)
npm install -D eslint @eslint/js eslint-config-prettier prettier typescript-eslint
# + plugins: eslint-plugin-react, eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y, etc.
# = 127 packages in node_modules
# Biome (alternative)
npm install -D --save-exact @biomejs/biome
# = 1 package
Configuration Comparison
Biome Config
// biome.json
{
"$schema": "https://biomejs.dev/schemas/2.0.0/schema.json",
"vcs": {
"enabled": true,
"clientKind": "git",
"useIgnoreFile": true
},
"organizeImports": {
"enabled": true
},
"linter": {
"enabled": true,
"rules": {
"recommended": true,
"correctness": {
"noUnusedVariables": "error",
"noUnusedImports": "error"
},
"suspicious": {
"noExplicitAny": "warn"
},
"style": {
"useConst": "error",
"noVar": "error"
}
}
},
"formatter": {
"enabled": true,
"indentStyle": "space",
"indentWidth": 2,
"lineWidth": 100
},
"javascript": {
"formatter": {
"quoteStyle": "single",
"trailingCommas": "es5",
"semicolons": "always"
}
}
}
ESLint + Prettier Config (Flat Config)
// eslint.config.js
import js from '@eslint/js';
import ts from 'typescript-eslint';
import react from 'eslint-plugin-react';
import reactHooks from 'eslint-plugin-react-hooks';
import a11y from 'eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y';
export default ts.config(
js.configs.recommended,
...ts.configs.strictTypeChecked,
{
plugins: {
react,
'react-hooks': reactHooks,
'jsx-a11y': a11y,
},
rules: {
'react-hooks/rules-of-hooks': 'error',
'react-hooks/exhaustive-deps': 'warn',
'jsx-a11y/anchor-is-valid': 'error',
// ... 50 more rules
},
}
);
// .prettierrc
// { "semi": true, "singleQuote": true, "tabWidth": 2 }
Biome: 1 file. ESLint + Prettier: 2-3 files, 127 packages.
Speed Benchmarks
Linting (10,000 TypeScript files)
| Tool | Time |
|---|---|
| Biome | 0.8s |
| ESLint (no type-checking) | 45s |
| ESLint (with typescript-eslint type-aware) | 120s+ |
Formatting (10,000 files)
| Tool | Time |
|---|---|
| Biome | 0.3s |
| Prettier | 12.1s |
Pre-commit Hook Impact (typical project, 50 staged files)
| Tool | Time |
|---|---|
| Biome | ~200ms |
| ESLint + Prettier | 3-8s |
The pre-commit time difference is the one developers feel most directly. Waiting 5+ seconds for every commit is a real friction point.
Rule Coverage Comparison
What Biome Has (450+ rules in v2.4)
- Core correctness rules (unused vars, typeof, no-debugger, etc.)
- TypeScript-aware rules (no-any, consistent-type-imports)
- Style rules (const, no-var, arrow functions)
- Import organization
- Security rules (no-dangerouslySetInnerHTML, eval)
What ESLint Has That Biome Lacks
| Category | ESLint Plugins | Biome Status |
|---|---|---|
| React Hooks rules | eslint-plugin-react-hooks | Partial (exhaustive-deps missing) |
| Accessibility | eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y | Partial (15 rules added in v2.4) |
| Next.js specific | eslint-config-next | ❌ Not supported |
| Import sorting | eslint-plugin-import | ✅ Built-in |
| Testing Library | eslint-plugin-testing-library | ❌ Not supported |
| Jest/Vitest | eslint-plugin-jest/vitest | ❌ Not supported |
| Tailwind class sorting | eslint-plugin-tailwindcss | ❌ Not yet |
| Storybook | eslint-plugin-storybook | ❌ Not supported |
| TypeScript type-aware | @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-* | Partial (~85% coverage, own synthesizer) |
The eslint-plugin-react-hooks exhaustive-deps rule and testing framework plugins are the most significant blockers for most teams.
Prettier Compatibility
Biome's formatter achieves 96%+ compatibility with Prettier's output for most codebases. The remaining 4% is mostly edge cases with complex template literals and certain JSX patterns.
# Check Prettier compatibility for your codebase
npx @biomejs/biome format --write src/
# Then: git diff --stat to see what changed
Migration Strategy
New Projects: Start with Biome
npx @biomejs/biome init
# Creates biome.json with recommended settings
# Replace package.json scripts
# Before:
"lint": "eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx",
"format": "prettier --write .",
"lint:fix": "eslint . --fix && prettier --write .",
# After:
"lint": "biome lint ./src",
"format": "biome format ./src --write",
"check": "biome check ./src", # lint + format together
Existing Projects: Official Migration Commands
Biome ships built-in migration commands that auto-convert ~70% of ESLint rules:
# Auto-convert .eslintrc → biome.json lint rules
npx @biomejs/biome migrate eslint --write
# Auto-convert .prettierrc → biome.json formatter config
npx @biomejs/biome migrate prettier --write
These commands read your existing config files and generate equivalent biome.json settings. Rules without a Biome equivalent are flagged for manual review. Typical migration time: 30–90 minutes depending on codebase complexity. For the remaining ~30%, you'll decide: add it back as a standalone ESLint rule, use the hybrid approach below, or accept the coverage reduction.
Gradual Migration
Option 1: Run Biome alongside ESLint (transitional)
npm install -D @biomejs/biome
# biome.json — disable rules covered by ESLint plugins you're keeping
{
"linter": {
"rules": {
"recommended": false, // Start with nothing
"correctness": { "noUnusedVariables": "error" }
}
},
"formatter": { "enabled": true } // Replace Prettier immediately
}
Option 2: Biome for formatting, ESLint for linting (common hybrid)
Many teams replace Prettier with Biome's formatter (easy, high benefit) while keeping ESLint for linting (retains plugin ecosystem):
# Remove prettier and eslint-config-prettier
npm uninstall prettier eslint-config-prettier
# Add biome for formatting only
npm install -D @biomejs/biome
// biome.json
{
"linter": { "enabled": false },
"formatter": { "enabled": true }
}
// eslint.config.js — no more prettier integration needed
This hybrid reduces complexity while keeping ESLint's plugin ecosystem.
VS Code Integration
Both have strong editor support:
// .vscode/settings.json — Biome
{
"editor.defaultFormatter": "biomejs.biome",
"editor.formatOnSave": true,
"[javascript]": { "editor.defaultFormatter": "biomejs.biome" },
"[typescript]": { "editor.defaultFormatter": "biomejs.biome" }
}
// .vscode/settings.json — ESLint + Prettier
{
"editor.defaultFormatter": "esbenp.prettier-vscode",
"editor.formatOnSave": true,
"eslint.validate": ["javascript", "typescript", "javascriptreact", "typescriptreact"]
}
CI/CD Performance Impact
For a monorepo with 50K files:
| Tool Stack | CI lint + format time |
|---|---|
| ESLint + Prettier | 8-15 minutes |
| Biome | 30-60 seconds |
This is where the speed advantage translates directly to developer velocity and CI costs.
Biome provides a dedicated biome ci command (distinct from biome check) that outputs GitHub-native PR annotations — lint errors appear inline on pull requests without extra tooling:
# .github/workflows/ci.yml
- uses: biomejs/setup-biome@v2
# auto-detects version from package.json / lockfile
- run: biome ci
# outputs GitHub annotations for inline PR comments
ESLint requires manual setup to achieve the same inline annotation behavior (reviewdog or similar). Biome's CI story is simpler out of the box.
Biome v2.4 also added --reporter=sarif for GitHub Advanced Security integration.
When to Choose Biome
Choose Biome if:
- Starting a new project
- Your pre-commit hooks are noticeably slow (>3 seconds)
- CI lint time is a bottleneck
- You're in a monorepo where ESLint runs multiple times
- Your project doesn't rely on jsx-a11y or complex React plugin rules
- You want fewer dependencies and simpler config
Keep ESLint + Prettier if:
eslint-plugin-react-hooksexhaustive-depsis enforced in your codebase (most significant blocker)- You rely on
eslint-plugin-testing-libraryoreslint-plugin-jest/vitest eslint-config-nextcatches Next.js-specific errors- You need
@typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-*rules with compiler-accurate precision - Your team has complex custom ESLint rules
- Primary framework is Vue or Svelte (Biome support still experimental)
The 2026 Landscape
Biome has grown from ~500K to ~5.4M weekly downloads in roughly 18 months. ESLint isn't declining (it grew 65% in 2025 to ~85M weekly as the JS ecosystem expanded) — but Biome is capturing new projects while ESLint retains existing ones. The npm download gap is ~15x today vs. 100x+ in 2024.
The 2026 roadmap includes expanded type-aware rules, better Vue/Svelte support, and enhanced monorepo handling. The eslint-plugin-react-hooks gap is the primary remaining blocker; once exhaustive-deps is implemented, the migration case for React projects becomes much stronger.
The pragmatic 2026 choice: New projects → Biome. Existing projects → swap Prettier for Biome's formatter immediately (15-minute win), then evaluate full migration based on your ESLint plugin dependencies.
Compare @biomejs/biome vs eslint vs prettier download trends on PkgPulse.
Compare Biome and Eslint-prettier package health on PkgPulse.
See the live comparison
View biome vs. eslint prettier on PkgPulse →