Skip to main content

Astro vs Hugo

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Hugo

318.0 B gzipped

Most Popular

Astro

1.9M weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Astro

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Astro

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Astro

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

astro icon

astro

Very Popular

Version 6.1.4

0
85
Excellent

Astro is a modern site builder with web best practices, performance, and DX front-of-mind.

Weekly Downloads
1.9M
↑14%
Bundle (gzip)
778.1 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
hugo icon

hugo

Niche

Version 0.0.3

0
49
Fair

Yet another node.js interface for philips hue

Weekly Downloads
2.2K
↑36%
Bundle (gzip)
318.0 B
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
20
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Astro and Hugo? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Astro leads with 1.9M weekly downloads — roughly 851.1x more. Hugo has 2.2K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Hugo has the smallest gzipped bundle at 318.0 B. Astro comes in at 778.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Astro has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Hugo has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Astro if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Hugo if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Astro and Hugo are solid choices for JavaScript development. Astro has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is astro better than hugo?
It depends on your needs. Astro has a health score of 85/100 while Hugo scores 49/100. Astro has more weekly downloads (1.9M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, astro or hugo?
Hugo has the smaller gzipped bundle at 318.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use astro vs hugo?
Based on npm download statistics, Astro has approximately 1.9M weekly downloads and Hugo has approximately 2.2K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, astro or hugo?
Astro currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Astro has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Hugo scores 20/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

Astro vs NextAstro vs Gatsby11ty vs AstroHugo vs Next11ty vs Hugo

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.