Version 2.1117.0
0
85
ExcellentAWS CDK CLI, the command line tool for CDK apps
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.2M
2%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 6.9 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Aws-cdk vs Pulumi
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Aws-cdk leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
pulumi
Niche
Version 0.0.1
0
49
Fair- Weekly Downloads
- 2.9K
↑6%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Aws-cdk and Pulumi? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Aws-cdk leads with 3.2M weekly downloads — roughly 1077.8x more. Pulumi has 2.9K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Pulumi has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Aws-cdk comes in at 6.9 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Aws-cdk has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Pulumi has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Aws-cdk if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Pulumi if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Aws-cdk and Pulumi are solid choices for JavaScript development. Aws-cdk has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is aws-cdk better than pulumi?
- It depends on your needs. Aws-cdk has a health score of 85/100 while Pulumi scores 49/100. Aws-cdk has more weekly downloads (3.2M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, aws-cdk or pulumi?
- Pulumi has the smaller gzipped bundle at 0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use aws-cdk vs pulumi?
- Based on npm download statistics, Aws-cdk has approximately 3.2M weekly downloads and Pulumi has approximately 2.9K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, aws-cdk or pulumi?
- Aws-cdk currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Aws-cdk has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Pulumi scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.