Version 0.0.3
Yet another node.js interface for philips hue
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.2K
- Bundle (gzip)
- 318.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Most Popular
Hugo
2.2K weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Hugo
20/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Hugo
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Jekyll
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 0.0.3
Yet another node.js interface for philips hue
Version 3.0.0-beta1
A blog-aware, static site generator in Ruby
Choosing between Hugo and Jekyll? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Hugo leads with 2.2K weekly downloads — roughly 3.2x more. Jekyll has 692 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Jekyll has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Hugo comes in at 318.0 B. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Hugo has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Jekyll has an overall health score of 47/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Hugo if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Jekyll if you value strong security track record.
Both Hugo and Jekyll are solid choices for JavaScript development. Hugo has the edge in overall health score (49/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.