Version 4.6.1
0
69
GoodNext.js and MDX based site generator.
- Weekly Downloads
- 148.9K
↓4%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 118.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
60
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Nextra vs Vitepress
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Nextra
118.2 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Vitepress
422.7K weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Vitepress
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Nextra
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Vitepress
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 1.6.4
0
81
ExcellentVite & Vue powered static site generator
- Weekly Downloads
- 422.7K
1%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 807.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Nextra and Vitepress? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Vitepress leads with 422.7K weekly downloads — roughly 2.8x more. Nextra has 148.9K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Nextra has the smallest gzipped bundle at 118.2 KB. Vitepress comes in at 807.0 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Vitepress has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Nextra has an overall health score of 69/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Nextra if you value strong security track record. Choose Vitepress if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Nextra and Vitepress are solid choices for JavaScript development. Vitepress has the edge in overall health score (81/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is nextra better than vitepress?
- It depends on your needs. Nextra has a health score of 69/100 while Vitepress scores 81/100. Vitepress has more weekly downloads (422.7K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, nextra or vitepress?
- Nextra has the smaller gzipped bundle at 118.2 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use nextra vs vitepress?
- Based on npm download statistics, Nextra has approximately 148.9K weekly downloads and Vitepress has approximately 422.7K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, nextra or vitepress?
- Vitepress currently has the higher overall health score at 81/100. Nextra has a maintenance score of 60/100 and Vitepress scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.