Skip to main content

Serverless vs Sst

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Serverless leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.

serverless icon

serverless

Very Popular

Version 4.33.3

0
85
Excellent

[![Serverless Framework AWS Lambda AWS DynamoDB AWS API Gateway](https://github.com/serverless/serverless/assets/2752551/66a8c6a9-bc4a-4116-b139-90c12963337e)](https://serverless.com)

Weekly Downloads
1.2M
↓10%
Bundle (gzip)
16.6 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
sst icon

sst

Popular

Version 4.6.11

0
81
Excellent

<p align="center"> <a href="https://sst.dev/"> <img alt="SST" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sst/identity/main/variants/sst-full.svg" width="300" /> </a> </p>

Weekly Downloads
431.9K
1%Stable
Bundle (gzip)
26.3 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Serverless and Sst? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Serverless leads with 1.2M weekly downloads — roughly 2.8x more. Sst has 431.9K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Serverless has the smallest gzipped bundle at 16.6 KB. Sst comes in at 26.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Serverless has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Sst has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Serverless if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Sst if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Serverless and Sst are solid choices for JavaScript development. Serverless has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is serverless better than sst?
It depends on your needs. Serverless has a health score of 85/100 while Sst scores 81/100. Serverless has more weekly downloads (1.2M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, serverless or sst?
Serverless has the smaller gzipped bundle at 16.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use serverless vs sst?
Based on npm download statistics, Serverless has approximately 1.2M weekly downloads and Sst has approximately 431.9K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, serverless or sst?
Serverless currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Serverless has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Sst scores 100/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

Aws-cdk vs Serverless

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.